PERSONAL LIBERTY DIGEST: Employees working with companies to stop corrupt unions

A recent report by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) shows that corruption in union offices across the nation is rampant. Over 300 union locations in the last two years have discovered embezzlement of millions of dollars in union funds (that is just the ones who got caught).

In the past, it was unions fighting against companies, but today, while corporations are indeed engaged in all manner of nefarious activity, it seems that employees prefer that plus getting paid over the way unions currently operate. The movie Four Brothers is a good representation which depicts the corrupt unions in Detroit. But while the UAW continues to be the leader in union corruption, the DOL reported cases involving unions representing a wide range of groups from firefighters to nurses to musicians to plumbers to postal workers.

The mainstream media would have you believe corporations use employees as weapons in their efforts to thwart unions… but it’s employees who are joining with their employers to thwart union corruption.

U-Haul workers are now lobbying the government to address regulations that would make it difficult for unions to organize. According to labor “experts,” this initiative by the workers has all the signs of a company-backed effort. U-Haul has said it did not force workers to participate in this campaign against unionizing, but it supported them by providing the language to use.

In recent times, the business lobby and employers have urged employees to show their resistance against numerous corporate taxes as well as show their solidarity towards recent favorable tax legislation. Columbia University’s political science expert Alexander Hertel-Fernandez, who has just written a book on the topic, said that apart from influencing business policy, corporations are also now increasing using the power of their workers to impact public policy and elections.

Of course, unions have a huge amount of leeway in how, when and where they can solicit employees, make promises and “organize,” while employers are much more restricted, so a company’s ability to “weaponize” an employee is limited.

Workers certainly do not want to lose their jobs and may fear retaliation from the employer, true, but many today don’t want their money used to promote — with ads and donations — political positions they don’t support. In fact, the Supreme Court is going to make a decision on this soon, which could affect public sector unions since they have been notorious in taking people’s money and spending that money on political ads many of their members are not proud of.

Read more here.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *